do rich people are happy??? there are happy b-coz they dun have anything to look forward to... they just use or buy what they need... us rich people buy what we want and be done with it... but the problem with us is we want more...
Why are nigerians y happiest people on earth.according to internet survey,with poverty,low salary,they r happy
Maybe they don't know what they're missing.
Ignorance is bliss. ... not trying to sound rude
Saturday, November 19, 2011
Switzerland Marketing Salary Surveys?
Hi, Anyone knows of marketing salary surveys in Switzerland. Most of the surveys I find concern financial categories.
Switzerland Marketing Salary Surveys?
Not sure if this is what you are looking for, play around on this site. http://www.quirks.com/directory/sourcebo...
Switzerland Marketing Salary Surveys?
Not sure if this is what you are looking for, play around on this site. http://www.quirks.com/directory/sourcebo...
I read a survey that americans' average salary is $35,000? Is this right?
I would say over all, it sounds about right.
I read a survey that americans' average salary is $35,000? Is this right?
I don't think it is true. It depends on where you live. If you live in California the average salary tends to be higher compared with if you live in Utah or somewhere else with lower standard of living.
converse safety shoes
I read a survey that americans' average salary is $35,000? Is this right?
I don't think it is true. It depends on where you live. If you live in California the average salary tends to be higher compared with if you live in Utah or somewhere else with lower standard of living.
converse safety shoes
According to a recent survey, the salaries of assistant professors have a mean of $40,756 and a standard devia
According to a recent survey, the salaries of assistant professors have a mean of $40,756 and a standard deviation of $8000. Assuming that the salaries of assistant professors follow a normal distribution, find the proportion of assistant professors who earn more than $50,000. Round your answer to at least four decimal places
According to a recent survey, the salaries of assistant professors have a mean of $40,756 and a standard devia
the general form of a normal distribution,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_dist...
or gaussian distribution is:
(1/(s*sqrt(2*pi))) * exp(-((x-mu)^2)/(2*s*s))
what you are looking for is the integral from x=50k to x=inf
for an answer I got 12.3942%
You can also use a z table for this. To find your z you subtract the mean and divide by the standard deviation.
(50k-40.756k)/8k=1.1555
Try going to this link (http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/z_table.... and entering 1.1555 into the above entry. You get the same answer displayed: 0.123943, or 12.3943%
According to a recent survey, the salaries of assistant professors have a mean of $40,756 and a standard devia
the general form of a normal distribution,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_dist...
or gaussian distribution is:
(1/(s*sqrt(2*pi))) * exp(-((x-mu)^2)/(2*s*s))
what you are looking for is the integral from x=50k to x=inf
for an answer I got 12.3942%
You can also use a z table for this. To find your z you subtract the mean and divide by the standard deviation.
(50k-40.756k)/8k=1.1555
Try going to this link (http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/z_table.... and entering 1.1555 into the above entry. You get the same answer displayed: 0.123943, or 12.3943%
Monday, May 24, 2010
Math help??
1. suppose a random sample of 1,250 women in a city was taken in order to determine the favorite type of music of all women in the city 2.To find out the average salary of female architects,a researcher randomly selected 100 female architects 3.jim asked Lake Middle School students to indicate thier favorite pet. He surveyed 2 samples and then the population of 320 students.how do the results from the two samples compare with the results from the population?
Math help??
Well, 1. and 2. do not have a question nor a problem listed. Do these statements all relate to each other? They don't seem to. Is all the sampling being done in the same population?
For 3., you don't list what the results of the two samples were vs. the survey of the entire population. So how can we compare them?
In short, next time when you ask for help, please list the entire question, not just part of it.
Math help??
Well, 1. and 2. do not have a question nor a problem listed. Do these statements all relate to each other? They don't seem to. Is all the sampling being done in the same population?
For 3., you don't list what the results of the two samples were vs. the survey of the entire population. So how can we compare them?
In short, next time when you ask for help, please list the entire question, not just part of it.
A Woman's Earned Money is her Own, but The Man's Earned Money is Theirs, Discuss?
Another factor, said Dr XXXX, was the professional woman’s expectation that the future husband’s income be in the $XXXXX to $XXXXX bracket. However, he said, the women did not believe in sharing their salaries with their husbands.
"Eight out of 10 women surveyed said they will refuse to share their money with their husbands, saying it was their money, while the husband is still expected to take care of all the household expenses.
"This will lead to men starting to wonder if they can afford to do so. In fact, there is a trend developing where professional men are starting to stay single."
Basically, it is summed up to:
If a man and his wife are both working, the women's earned money is her own to do as she pleases, but the man's money is for both of them and paying the daily expenses.
Talk about equality....
A Woman's Earned Money is her Own, but The Man's Earned Money is Theirs, Discuss?
I say, wait until they get married and see if they still feel that way. Most households need both incomes.
Reply:if a woman wants to keep her income to herself thats fine, i'll take care of the household expenses, but don't expect for me to take care of anything on your end. when married both parties should help maintain household expenses, if the wife wants to be selfish about her income then perhaps she is not good wife material and should be kicked out and left to fend for herself with her entire income.
Reply:I don't think that it is right for a wife to keep all of her earnings for herself. It is important the husband and wife agree on a budget and how much "fun money" each should have. The hard part of course is agreeing on a budget.
"Eight out of 10 women surveyed said they will refuse to share their money with their husbands, saying it was their money, while the husband is still expected to take care of all the household expenses.
"This will lead to men starting to wonder if they can afford to do so. In fact, there is a trend developing where professional men are starting to stay single."
Basically, it is summed up to:
If a man and his wife are both working, the women's earned money is her own to do as she pleases, but the man's money is for both of them and paying the daily expenses.
Talk about equality....
A Woman's Earned Money is her Own, but The Man's Earned Money is Theirs, Discuss?
I say, wait until they get married and see if they still feel that way. Most households need both incomes.
Reply:if a woman wants to keep her income to herself thats fine, i'll take care of the household expenses, but don't expect for me to take care of anything on your end. when married both parties should help maintain household expenses, if the wife wants to be selfish about her income then perhaps she is not good wife material and should be kicked out and left to fend for herself with her entire income.
Reply:I don't think that it is right for a wife to keep all of her earnings for herself. It is important the husband and wife agree on a budget and how much "fun money" each should have. The hard part of course is agreeing on a budget.
Amnesty For Illegals?
What would happen if amnesty was given to illegal immigrants living in the U.S.? Not just those from Spanish speaking countries, but those from every country. What would this mean for employers who hire illegal immigrants? Illegal immigrants' salaries would have to rise to minimum wage, so how would this play out? Add on free health care, what would this mean for hospitals?
I'm needing some opinions for a small survey for an Ethics class. Thanks.
Amnesty For Illegals?
You looking for ethics conversation?
OK, why forgive one type of crime and grant amnesty--and not others? Because illegal immigrants "come for a better life?" Puh-leez--they come for money.
Don't bank robbers actually rob banks for money? If a bank robber is from the ghetto...say SOuth Central LA, should we grant him/her amnesty too?
Reply:Thanks for the Best Answer! Report Abuse
Reply:If amnesty is given to the illegal aliens, the cost for retirement for those folks is a given. The cost in numbers? 2.2 Trillion Dollars.
This is an extensive site and a pretty good discussion of the issues. Amnesty, however, is a mind boggling stupied idea.
Reference for those who wish to know:
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigra...
Reply:If amnesty was granted to all illegal immigrants it would lead to disaster for america. As it was in the 1980's, it will only promote more people to break the law and enter into america illegally. A lot of people like to talk about how "racist" a lot of americans are for wanting an end to illegal immigration and a violation of human rights to build a wall. But what about the rights of american who want their laws respected? or the rights of americans who want a secure border? these people who entered into our country realized the potential consequences of their actions that they could possibly be seperated from family. Enough is enough, its time for people to start respecting the rights of americans, and the rights of every person that wants to do the right thing for their nation without being called a racist for it.
Reply:very simple- CHAOS !
Reply:YES, but only to people who had been some years here working hard, paying taxes and conributing some way to the economy of the country. no to cash workers who avoid taxes and do not learn english and not are interested in helping to conribute to the economy. health care is paid the same way by illegals with deductions to social services, healthcare insurances and federal and local taxes eaven if that number does not belongs to them. IRS have give them the oportonity to pay taxes and some do eaven pay more and get less refound and no child credit but at least are good with uncle sam and already for some years, what its the difference then? I think they deserve the chance for an opportunity to a way to legalization. the rest can be tracked and deported.
Reply:If the millions of illegal immigrants in this country were just all of a sudden told that they were now legal, what kind of message does this send to the world? If I was trying to become a citizen, to me it would say "hey, if we can get another few million illegals in here, they'll grant amnesty again." It sets us up for the same situation in a few more years.
If you trespass on someone's backyard, you get arrested. These illegals are all trespassing on America's backyard, and they should be punished, not rewarded.
We already give them free care at hospitals. Some states give them drivers licenses. If they commit a crime, we put them in a prison here in the states, and our tax money goes to put food in their stomachs. Many illegals get food stamps, welfare, and social security. Why? They don't contribute. They don't pay taxes. But yet we give them benefits that are supposed to be reserved for people who pay in.
We need to ship them all back to where they came from, put up that wall/fence along the Mexican border, and crack down harder on people who hire illegals.
Reply:Round them up and deport them, whatever the cost. Fine the people that hire them to pay for this.
Reply:The amnesty of 1986 was granted to all, so why would you think that another amnesty would not be open to all. I am not for amnesty for anyone, because all that amnesty brings is more demands for more amnesty. In 1986 we granted amnesty to 3.1 illegals and now 20 years later we have 12-20 million demanding the same, and about 50,000 more coming each year. With the 50,000 more coming each year because our fearless leaders do not want to secure the borders, so wages will never go up because there is a endless supply of cheap labor. As to health care, 12-20 million illegals being granted the right to goverment paid health care other than the emergency care they are entitled to now, you do the math
Reply:One word. No. Everyone has a right to come to this country to try and better their lives. That's what America was founded on. But they should do it the proper way. Illegals are just that, and do not deserve amnesty.
Reply:Probably exactly what happened last time we had an amnesty for illegal aliens -- a HUGE rise in the number of illegal aliens finding their way here and settling here in hopes of forcing another amnesty. Wages drop. Schools become overcrowded. Hospitals close. Infrastructure is overused and endangered...and so on and so on.
Rewarding illegal activity only encourages more of the same. We should have learned that the first time around and stop repeating the same mistake over and over.
Reply:Hell no. Texas would rise up. Do it legally or face the consequences, government mandated or not.
camper shoes stock
I'm needing some opinions for a small survey for an Ethics class. Thanks.
Amnesty For Illegals?
You looking for ethics conversation?
OK, why forgive one type of crime and grant amnesty--and not others? Because illegal immigrants "come for a better life?" Puh-leez--they come for money.
Don't bank robbers actually rob banks for money? If a bank robber is from the ghetto...say SOuth Central LA, should we grant him/her amnesty too?
Reply:Thanks for the Best Answer! Report Abuse
Reply:If amnesty is given to the illegal aliens, the cost for retirement for those folks is a given. The cost in numbers? 2.2 Trillion Dollars.
This is an extensive site and a pretty good discussion of the issues. Amnesty, however, is a mind boggling stupied idea.
Reference for those who wish to know:
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigra...
Reply:If amnesty was granted to all illegal immigrants it would lead to disaster for america. As it was in the 1980's, it will only promote more people to break the law and enter into america illegally. A lot of people like to talk about how "racist" a lot of americans are for wanting an end to illegal immigration and a violation of human rights to build a wall. But what about the rights of american who want their laws respected? or the rights of americans who want a secure border? these people who entered into our country realized the potential consequences of their actions that they could possibly be seperated from family. Enough is enough, its time for people to start respecting the rights of americans, and the rights of every person that wants to do the right thing for their nation without being called a racist for it.
Reply:very simple- CHAOS !
Reply:YES, but only to people who had been some years here working hard, paying taxes and conributing some way to the economy of the country. no to cash workers who avoid taxes and do not learn english and not are interested in helping to conribute to the economy. health care is paid the same way by illegals with deductions to social services, healthcare insurances and federal and local taxes eaven if that number does not belongs to them. IRS have give them the oportonity to pay taxes and some do eaven pay more and get less refound and no child credit but at least are good with uncle sam and already for some years, what its the difference then? I think they deserve the chance for an opportunity to a way to legalization. the rest can be tracked and deported.
Reply:If the millions of illegal immigrants in this country were just all of a sudden told that they were now legal, what kind of message does this send to the world? If I was trying to become a citizen, to me it would say "hey, if we can get another few million illegals in here, they'll grant amnesty again." It sets us up for the same situation in a few more years.
If you trespass on someone's backyard, you get arrested. These illegals are all trespassing on America's backyard, and they should be punished, not rewarded.
We already give them free care at hospitals. Some states give them drivers licenses. If they commit a crime, we put them in a prison here in the states, and our tax money goes to put food in their stomachs. Many illegals get food stamps, welfare, and social security. Why? They don't contribute. They don't pay taxes. But yet we give them benefits that are supposed to be reserved for people who pay in.
We need to ship them all back to where they came from, put up that wall/fence along the Mexican border, and crack down harder on people who hire illegals.
Reply:Round them up and deport them, whatever the cost. Fine the people that hire them to pay for this.
Reply:The amnesty of 1986 was granted to all, so why would you think that another amnesty would not be open to all. I am not for amnesty for anyone, because all that amnesty brings is more demands for more amnesty. In 1986 we granted amnesty to 3.1 illegals and now 20 years later we have 12-20 million demanding the same, and about 50,000 more coming each year. With the 50,000 more coming each year because our fearless leaders do not want to secure the borders, so wages will never go up because there is a endless supply of cheap labor. As to health care, 12-20 million illegals being granted the right to goverment paid health care other than the emergency care they are entitled to now, you do the math
Reply:One word. No. Everyone has a right to come to this country to try and better their lives. That's what America was founded on. But they should do it the proper way. Illegals are just that, and do not deserve amnesty.
Reply:Probably exactly what happened last time we had an amnesty for illegal aliens -- a HUGE rise in the number of illegal aliens finding their way here and settling here in hopes of forcing another amnesty. Wages drop. Schools become overcrowded. Hospitals close. Infrastructure is overused and endangered...and so on and so on.
Rewarding illegal activity only encourages more of the same. We should have learned that the first time around and stop repeating the same mistake over and over.
Reply:Hell no. Texas would rise up. Do it legally or face the consequences, government mandated or not.
camper shoes stock
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)